Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Ocean Grove opinions’ Category

images

 exit 100 off the GSP.


Exit 100 off the GSP.

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger.net

The deal to turn the Laingdon Hotel into a substance treatment center on Main Avenue was hatched last August—before the presidential election.  In our discussions about this matter, we learned something about the economics and we found out that such facilities can be very lucrative, especially for those high end clients who probably would have been found at the new Sprout/Laingdon location. But we also found out that insurance money is available for patients, including those who are not wealthy, such as those under Medicaid.    Also we spoke about a law enforcement program which lets drug criminals enter rehab instead of going to jail.

And that money trail exposed why entrepreneurs were interested in such facilities.

Our discussion also revealed that Ocean Grove still has  multifamily dwellings  and some multi-unit boarding houses such as the Whitfield (now deceased) and the Warrington  (now unoccupied and  aspiring to be an expensive “boutique hotel.”)

But a rehab facility could be created in a smallish multi-family house, even of only 2 or 3 units, just as such places could also be condoized, and neither use seems to be good for the town.   But the pressure to find new sources of investment income in OG could grow even larger, given the rising spending on healthcare.

Now the Grove is in danger of going viral with such “medical shelters” for addicts (rich or poor), Mary’s style clients, or whatever such “shelters” might be devised  by inventive investors.

Those who lived in this town in the 1980’s vividly recall all the “shelters” that were found around the Grove, and many of those attracted unattractive residents who hung out in various favored locations, smoking, yelling, sleeping on benches, and smelling.  We have heard of some of that from  residents who lived here during that era who are now dismayed that we might move in that direction once again.

But why would Neptune Township allow such deterioration?  Well, there are those in the Grove who believe that  Neptune officials really don’t care much about Ocean Grove and would be happy for it to slide into the abyss, as long as the tax dollars continue to flow in one form or another. And there are the local developers who are happy to exploit the town for money regardless of the consequences in terms of crowding, parking, and lifestyle deterioration.

However, during our last look at this subject,  before we could really sink our digital teeth into the rehab/Laingdon matter, the application for a use-variance at the Zoning Board of Adjustment was abruptly withdrawn, and we don’t know why.  Maybe the Blogfinger poll and citizen comments scared them away, but more likely we could find the answer by following the money.  Being unpopular with the OG public has never frightened the Neptune Township and Ocean Grove movers and shakers when money was at stake.

The Township ZBA office denies knowing anything about the withdrawal. But on January 14, an article appeared in the Wall Street Journal by Jeanne Whalen in the US News section, page A-3. which might shed some light on the situation. It was sent to us by a citizen reporter.

In it she explains that there are provisions under the Affordable Care Act (i.e. Obamacare) that forces ACA insurance providers to pay for addiction rehab. The amount of money available that way is “huge,” as it tries to chase the widespread increase in deaths due to opioids such as heroine and fentanyl, especially in the north east, including Monmouth County.

According to the WSJ, “There are 2.8 million Americans with substance abuse disorders who would lose some or all of their insurance if the ACA is repealed.”

“Researchers at Harvard Medical School and NYU estimated a repeal would withdraw at least $5.5 billion annually from the treatment of mental health conditions including substance abuse.”

So, is there any wonder that investors have been  sniffing around our town thinking of rehab facilities as sources of healthcare income?  And perhaps, after Trump won, Sprout may have freaked out and chosen to drop the  Laingdon idea.

But, because the opioid addiction problem is growing and harming families and small businesses, the new administration might be compelled to keep the money coming, and if so, OG is really a perfect place to open rehab. facilities.

If Mary’s Place could get zoning approval for their “shelter” without even a variance, then you’d better not pout, you’d better not cry–I’m telling you why:  Santa Claus is coming to town and he has goodies in his sleigh for those who want to help addicts in the Grove.

THE PUPPINI SISTERS:

Read Full Post »

 

This is why Grovers need to pay attention to HPC issues. Blogfinger file photo. ©

This is why Grovers need to pay attention to HPC issues. Blogfinger file photo. ©

The  Township Committee is having a first reading of the new HPC guidelines this Monday at 7:00.  The Historical Society sent out an unsigned email stating,
“These new guidelines are very damaging to the historic district and threaten our historic designation. I’m hoping to get a good showing at the meeting to voice our concern.
The draft can be found on the township web site under committee agenda for Dec. 12. Scroll all the way to the bottom .
Thanks for any help you can offer.”

Below is the official announcement by Neptune Township regarding the HPC guidelines ordinance:

ORDINANCE NO. 16-45

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE BY AMENDING SECTION 508, ENTITLED, “HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES”

WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines have needed amendment from time to time based on changed circumstances,

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Township Committee of the Township of Neptune in the County of Monmouth in the State of New Jersey that the Land Development Ordinance, Volume II Section 508, entitled, “Historic Preservation Design Guidelines” is hereby amended as follows:

§508 – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.

c. The Design Criteria in Guidelines: The aforesaid Guidelines, also known as the “Ocean Grove Historic District Architectural Design Guidelines for Residential Structures” are hereby adopted as an integral part of this Ordinance and incorporated in the Ordinance by reference to the Guidelines available as part of this Ordinance for review in the Clerk’s Office of Neptune Township. Future amendments to the Guidelines, where minor in nature; that is, not amending the entire Guideline document, may be amended by Resolution with all dates of amendments noted in the Guideline document.

All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances that are inconsistent herewith are repealed, but only to the extent of such inconsistency.

The amended Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and the publication as required by law.

APPROVED ON FIRST READING: APPROVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED:

___________________________ Richard J. Cuttrell,
Municipal Clerk

___________________________ Kevin B. McMillan,
Mayor

 

Editor’s Note:    

Here is a link to read the guidelines:

www.neptunetownship.org/agendas-minutes/township-committee

Click on Dec 12 in the agenda column and then scroll down to Ordinance 16-45 and then keep scrolling down and you will find the Guidelines dated October, 2016.

But where are the latest changes?  Is there an official document that enumerates the changes?   And who wrote these Guideline changes and why?

Someone sent us a notice from the OGHOA which said, “A key change will limit application of the design guidelines to the street-facing facade only of a building. The result of this change alone is not difficult to imagine. The sides and backs of homes could be faced with different materials, and historically appropriate materials would no longer be a requirement on non-street-facing facades.”  

—Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

 

ETTA JAMES

Read Full Post »

This is what's left of the Park View Inn on Sea View Avenue. Blogfinger photo Sept 22, 2016 ©

This is what’s left of the Park View Inn on Seaview Avenue. Blogfinger photo Sept 22, 2016 ©  On the left is the Warrington (see our Warrington posts), and on the right is the La Pierre condos  at the lake and a private home on Seaview. Click on photo and you might be able to discern palm trees in A. Park.

 

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

Shirley and Ted Bell were married 62 years ago in the Park View Inn on Seaview Avenue in Ocean Grove which was owned by Shirley’s parents.  It was a busy place and quite wonderful.  There were porches in the back where guests could look out onto Wesley Lake and enjoy great hotel food.  Lake Avenue ambled by, and walkers provided a parade for the Park Viewers. The Park was Founders Park.

Ted, an eminent Ocean Grove historian, recalls that Lake Avenue was “always a walkway.”  The founders would not allow even a horse and buggy on that footpath.  Lake Avenue actually had two levels, with the houses and hotels being elevated (see photo below).  But for now, Ted and Shirley can sit on their porch on Seaview Avenue, look across the lake, and see real palm trees!

1896. Wesley Lake. Ocean Grove. Clearly the precedent for Lake Avenue is a walkway. Courtesy of Ted Bell.

1896. Wesley Lake. Ocean Grove. Clearly the precedent for Lake Avenue is a walkway. Courtesy of Ted Bell, Ocean Grove historian. Look closely and you will see Ted walking over to Days Ice Cream Garden.

 

1896. OG. Lake Avenue had upper and a lower elevations. No one imagined that someone might want a roadway there. Courtesy of Ted Bell

1896. OG. Lake Avenue had upper and a lower elevations. No one imagined that someone might want a roadway there. Courtesy of Ted Bell.

Now that the Inn is gone, the Township has approved plans to subdivide that narrow lot into 4 undersized house lots.  Two would be on Seaview Avenue, while two would be on Lake Avenue.   Those lots are currently for sale.  The two lake front lots are $459,000 each.  The two  Seaview Avenue lots are $419,000 each. The four houses planned are said to have received approval for 3 stories each.

But since Lake Avenue is not a street or a road, land use law would forbid building those two lakeside houses.  They should have never been given permission.  We also need to determine if the lakeside houses are being built on Green Acres properties.

Municipal Land Use Law (New Jersey). Official record.  Click to read it easier. Source: Jack Bredin.

Municipal Land Use Law (New Jersey). Official record. Click to read it easier. Source: Jack Bredin.

The neighbors over there are concerned about parking  and access issues. Supposedly a path between the houses would allow access to Lake Avenue from Sea View.  Or the residents could walk around to Lake Avenue  (aka Beach Avenue) by the boardwalk and then head west.  But what about UPS, garbage trucks, mail delivery, etc.?

And won’t those houses be crowded together when built on small lots?  Would they get any breezes or light?   Aren’t OG lots small enough?  Shouldn’t there be only two houses there, fronting on Seaview and with lovely rear yards and views of the lake?

Blogfinger will be investigating these issues.  Please comment if you have any information.

Link to our 1/14/16 article about the land under the now demolished Park View Inn.  It is very interesting:

Is the Park View Inn subdivision in violation of New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law ? When is a street not a street?

So how exactly were these permissions given?  How long has this been going on?

PEGGY LEE

 

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

The Warrington's condition has been deteriorating. Photo by concerned neighbor. 9/16 © Special to Blogfinger

The Warrington’s condition has been deteriorating. Note the graffiti. Photo by Concerned Neighbor. 7/1/16. © Special to Blogfinger

The Warrington: Squatters, drug users and other upstanding citizens have been seen in the building. Note the graffiiti. Photo by concerned neighbor 9/16. Special to Blogfinger

The Warrington: Squatters, drug users and other upstanding citizens have been seen in the building. Note the graffiti. Photo by Concerned Neighbor, 7/1/16. Special to Blogfinger.

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

“Jack Ancona, LLC, aka the Warrington Hotel ” intends to go ahead with plans to remodel this former rest home into a high-end boutique hotel overlooking Wesley Lake.  Supposedly it will have 16 rooms.  The owner of the building, which is next to the site of the former Park View Inn, has received site plan approval from the Township.  At the last Committee meeting, the owner was granted approval to “build and locate an innkeeper’s suite in the basement.”  Such a structure is prohibited by ordinance, but the Zoning Board of Adjustment has  permitted this,  and so has the Township. The Township has executed a Developers Agreement with “Jack Ancona LLC” to make sure that the work is done properly.  But Developers Agreements are not executed until all other approvals have been recorded.

We will look into those approvals, including concerns about the 3 lots that are included in the Warrington’s plans.  The Warrington used to be shown on the tax map as existing on one lot:  Block 101, Lot 2.

Meanwhile the building is in poor condition.  Sawbucks Construction Co. has been sending one or two workers into the building daily  for the last 4-6 weeks, and the neighbors have noted daily hammering. No one seems to know what those workers are doing inside. They wonder if building permits were granted for this work.  Such permits should be openly posted at the site.

The Neptune Township Police Dept has been “exceptional” according to a neighbor in responding quickly to calls to deal with incursions at the site.  Graffiti has been cleared from the building, and, according to nearby residents,  the contractor has taken down shrubbery on the lakeside, and that is supposed to be illegal in a Green Acres location, which Lake Avenue is said to be.

As usual, due to lack of transparency, the neighbors on Seaview Avenue are complaining that they do not have enough information regarding the future of the site.  They worry that the hotel, which will not have on-site parking, will worsen an already difficult parking situation.  Many people in that vicinity are year-round residents, and they already often have trouble with parking, 12 months of the year.   One resident estimates that at least 10% of those who park there are headed to Asbury.  They also are worried about the garbage disposal from the hotel.  How will that be accomplished?

The owner has told some of them that all guests will park off-site somewhere and then be offered transportation back to the hotel.  Has such a shuttle plan been approved? This sounds potentially  like an innovative solution, but will it work and satisfy those high end customers, and where will they park those cars?  And will those well-to-do guests return after experiencing the OG parking life?

Locals are also worried because the hotel front is on Lake Avenue, a walkway, and they were told that the hotel has been granted an  access pathway between the buildings to reach the Lake side of the hotel from Seaview, but that no garbage, deliveries,  or other non-personal items can be moved via that passageway—-it would be just for guests and their luggage.    We have no details regarding these elements.

It is said that a room in that luxury hotel might cost up to $300.00 per night.  Can someone want to stay there when there is inconvenient parking and when there is no alcohol inside?  And what about parking for visitors that the guests attract? And how about the Asbury Hotel, a boutique hotel just a few blocks away in A. Park?

More details should be provided to the public.  How will this hotel impact the quality of life for that community?

Finally, we have reported on speculation that the Township would like to turn that part of Lake Avenue into a road for cars.  There is widespread anticipatory opposition to that idea.  See our recent articles about whether Lake Avenue is a road or a street. If it is not, then no road could be built there. It would be illegal.

See our forthcoming piece about the 4 lot subdivision which is the site of the former Park View Inn on Seaview, next door to the Warrington. There are some related issues.

Here is a link to a related article dated March, 2015 on BF:

Just Wondering about the Warrington Hotel

LOUDON WAINWRIGHT III    from The Aviator

 

Read Full Post »

Ocean Grove, Main Avenue. July 4, 2009. Paul Goldfinger photo ©  Click to enlarge

Ocean Grove, Main Avenue. July 4, 2009. Paul Goldfinger photo ©  Click to enlarge

A letter appeared in the June 2, 2016 edition of the Coaster entitled, “Disappointed in Ocean Grove” It was from Ocean Grove United.

 

Letter to the Editor. the Coaster, June 2, 2016.

Letter to the Editor. the Coaster, June 2, 2016.  Click to enlarge.

 

This is not the first time that OGU has taken a public stance regarding  religious leaders who speak at the Sunday services during the summer. The group complained about Kurt Cameron, about Mike Huckabee and about Rabbi Jonathan Cahn. They have pressured the CMA to only  invite certain speakers who pass their litmus test.

Last August 17, when Rev. Tony Campolo appeared in the Grove,  OGU held a demonstration in Auditorium Square Park welcoming him to the Great Auditorium.   Here is a link.

OGU clams up and stifles free speech in the shadows of the Great Auditorium.

This season Campolo was not invited to speak in the Great Auditorium, presumably because of his known favorable stance regarding  gays in the Church.

So now we have this letter condemning the CMA for not embracing Campolo in Ocean Grove this year.

Of course OGU has a right to express its opinion, but  this letter is full of obfuscation instead of clarity of meaning. Where in the letter do we find the words “gay,” or “Camp Meeting Association?”  Why does the headline confuse “Ocean Grove” with “CMA?”  Who are the “many members of the community” who, they say, are concerned about the absence of Tony Campolo?  And finally why does OGU think it should concern itself with the CMA programming?

This letter should have been rejected by the Coaster because it accuses the CMA of hypocrisy  and motives that include “not wanting speakers who preach an accepting message of love and diversity,”  This  bomb-throwing is intolerant and unfair.

And why doesn’t the OGU air out its issues privately in the Grove instead of blaring them out-loud in the Coaster, where most of the readers could care less about this topic?

This letter is  a disrespectful public declaration of war by OGU at a time when factions in the Grove need to  work together for the common good.

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

 

CANADIAN BRASS   “Bring a Torch Jeanette, Isabella.”

 

Read Full Post »

 

Blogfinger in the spin cycle. © Don't make me dizzy.  Photographer unknown.

Blogfinger in the spin cycle. © Don’t make me dizzy. Photographer unknown.

To the Editor:

Below is a letter we sent to the OGHOA regarding their being MIA on RSIS parking issues and asking what their strategy is.  

I believe that, beyond contacting Mr. Lago at the Dept. of Community Affairs, we should encourage your readers to write to the OGHOA and ask/request that they initiate/increase their efforts on this critically important issue.  Ocean Grovers need to begin to hold the OGHOA accountable for being our advocates.  Let’ start a letter writing campaign/groundswell to get OGHOA moving.

Dear OGHOA:

We live in Ocean Grove.  Parking is an important concern for our family and I found it curious, if not outright disturbing, that no representative of the OGHOA went to Trenton last week to lobby against changes to the application of RSIS standards within OG.  

You are well aware that if Neptune Township is successful in negating these regulations, an explosion of condos will result, as will further exacerbation of the current parking shortage.  These dynamics could well jeopardize our Historic District designation.   This is an issue that is directly in the sweet spot for the OGHOA.

Further, I am mystified that you have not, to my knowledge, filed complaints/legal challenges with appropriate State agencies regarding the non-compliance of recent real estate projects.  How many condos will you watch being built that don’t provide adequate parking before you act?

  And, importantly, we have not seen evidence of the OGHOA being part of the dialogue for the likely non-compliance of the North End development (will an underground parking lot meet the full RSIS requirements?  Not likely).  To date, it appears that Blogfinger is the only entity that is fighting back

The RSIS regulations give you a very powerful tool to control development.   What are you doing to assure these regulations are enforced and prevent circumnavigation of existing parking standards by Neptune Township and their crony developers (other than passively watching it all play out)?   We need you to be activists on this issue.  I’m sure all residents of OG would like to understand your strategy for managing this issue to OG’s advantage.  Please let us know what you are doing.

Sincerely,

DAVID HEPLER is a resident of Ocean Grove

December 21, 2015

Editor’s Note:  Here is the “hook” regarding the RSIS rules.  If someone wants to put up a condo building with the RSIS standards in place, then it will be impossible for them to comply, because they would have to put the parking on their lot or lots. Since that would be impossible in most situations, then a single family house or an empty lot is the only option.  Single family houses should get the exemption from the State because if someone wants to put up a single family house, there will be no room for the required driveway and parking. So the exemption for them would create a single family Victorian house with no driveway or garage, a situation that is not only historic but is very Grovey.  —-Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

DAVID.   Thanks for that constructive comment.  We should ring some bells for you.  Where are those Del-Vikings?

 

 

Read Full Post »

A fine kettle of fish. Phrase made famous by Laurel and Hardy to describe a big mess.---PG

A fine kettle of fish. Phrase made famous by Laurel and Hardy to describe a big mess.—PG

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor at Blogfinger and Jack Bredin, researcher.

At the October 26, 2015 Neptune Township Committee meeting, the following conversation took place:

OGHOA member: Did you hear from WAVE?

Gene Anthony (Township attorney:) No, but there are not any other developers knocking on the door.

Jack Bredin: Did you advertise a request for proposals?

Randy Bishop: It isn’t necessary because this is private property.

Jack Bredin: Did you ever hear of the Riviera Plan?*

Bishop: Yes.

This conversation indicates that the Township has abandoned the 2008 public North End Redevelopment Plan and has, instead, substituted a general development plan which is something that private land developers do, but ordinarily, to do that, they must conform to the Township zoning which, in Ocean Grove,  is single family homes.

As you may recall, when the Committee allowed the North End to become an Area in Need of Redevelopment, it was approving a change in zoning to allow 165 residential units instead of single family homes.

In doing so, the Township Committee became in charge of the process and was supposed to advertise for redevelopers, however, somehow that step was skipped, and WAVE and the CMA were anointed as redevelopers, and now the Township wants to keep the Redevelopment zoning for 165 units while allowing the process to proceed as if this were a private development project. Mixing those two is illegal.

This quote is from the  NJ Municipal Land Use Law regarding Areas in Need of Redevelopment:  “The municipality shall be responsible for implementing redevelopment plans and carrying out redevelopment projects pursuant to section 8 of P.L. 1992, c.79 (C.40A:12A-8).”

WAVE will try to hide behind this subterfuge as they complete a new North End Plan which is something that a private developer could do, but not a redeveloper. Randy Bishop presented a new plan from the redeveloper WAVE at an April, 2015  Committee meeting, but that fishy plan has not yet been adopted by the Township. So far, no Redevelopers Agreement has been signed either, despite promises to do so.

The original 2008 NERP, under control of the Township, still remains in force. We expect that WAVE, acting through the Township Committee, will try to pass a new plan or use the old plan as the centerpiece of a private general development project.

What we are witnessing is a crooked manipulation of zoning in order to permit the abandonment of the restrictive redevelopment process while keeping the special zoning component and thumbing their noses at the people of Ocean Grove.

Randy Bishop says that the process is now “private,” so it seems unlikely that WAVE will divulge their members’ names as promised.

How to block this illegal situation? When the original or a new plan is submitted by WAVE without a “request for proposals” by the Township, a citizens group could file a suit in Superior Court against the Township.

Ideally, that would be the Ocean Grove Home Owners Association’s responsibility, but as you know, those Home Groaners are ineffective, feckless, clueless, enablers of this fine kettle of fish.

*The Riviera project was an extensive North End plan created by a serious and well known developer from Allenhurst who submitted his design for approval. He was rejected and he has angrily  complained that the process was unfair and illegal and that he was treated badly by the Ocean Grove principals involved with the North End Redevelopment Plan. We have his comments expressed in an email exchange.  Bishop said (above)  that he knew of the plan.

http://ssjdevelopment.com/plan9.htm

The Township Committee and its cheerleaders including the OGHOA never respond to our articles about wrongdoing; they simply whistle a happy tune,  but they have to know that someone besides Blogfinger might expose them in the future.

DINAH SHORE  from the King and I.

Read Full Post »

Inside the Great Auditorium, June, 2007. This image appears in Bell, Bell and Dufresne's definitive history of the GA. By Paul Goldfinger © Blogfinger.net

Inside the Great Auditorium, June, 2007. This image appears in Bell, Bell and Dufresne’s definitive history of the GA. By Paul Goldfinger © Blogfinger.net

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger:

It turns out that Tony Campolo is a well known Baptist Evangelical preacher.   He has been to the GA many times in the past and has a reputation for being a very entertaining speaker.

In recent times, he has caused some controversy because of his opinions about gays and about gay marriage. According to OGU, he is an “activist” who has “publicly expressed his support for the inclusion of same-sex couples in the church. ”

According to OGU, he has said, “I am finally ready to call for the full acceptance of Christian gay couples into the church.”

Rev. Tony Campolo. Internet photo.

Rev. Tony Campolo. Internet photo.

Ordinarily Blogfinger would take no interest in the GA Sunday sermons, except this time a local organization, Ocean Grove United, has called for its members and friends to “welcome” Rev. Dr. Tony Campolo when he comes here Sunday to be the guest speaker.

Is this the first time that an organization other than the CMA has formally planned to “welcome” a speaker at the Sunday sermons?

But what interests us the most at Blogfinger is that OGU, in a follow-up email, has not only repeated its notice to supporters to “make every effort to attend” on Sunday, but now they say that Rev. Campolo “has received a great deal of flack for supporting the lgbt community, and those who disagree with him will not turn out for his program. It is extremely important for the CMA to see that Ministers who preach love will pack the house. Please tell friends and neighbors as well.”

Is that true that only Campolo’s supporters plan to show up?

In addition OGU asks its supporters to “gather outside the auditorium at 9:30” The service begins at 10:30 am.

So, without making any judgments, I have to say that this sounds like a political demonstration/message and thus meets our criteria as news. Even if a group gathers one hour before the event, and even if there are no signs or chants, their very presence will carry a powerful message as described above,

This is not the first time that a situation like this has occurred in the Grove, and this conflict will affect the entire town in one way or another. No matter how Sunday morning unfolds, Blogfinger will report on it.  Those of you who attend can email us with your views or you can comment under this post.

 

THE MORMON TABERNACLE CHOIR WITH THE PHILADELPHIA BRASS ENSEMBLE:   “Abide With Me; ‘Tis Eventide.”

Read Full Post »

Wesley Lake looking towards the North End of Ocean Grove. Paul Goldfinger photograph. ©

Wesley Lake looking towards the North End of Ocean Grove. Paul Goldfinger photograph. April 1, 2015.

 

By Paul Goldfinger, MD, 11/21/24:

I did a review of Blogfinger articles having “North End Redevelopment” in the title, and they number over 300. Blogfinger has been addressing this topic as well as parking concerns for over  15 years.  We have heard it all   and wrote many more posts over 300 and we received very little support from the OG public or from  OG organizations, especially the Home Groaners.

Now we learn that a new group has formed to address North End Redevelopment concerns as the project is currently  teetering at the edge of  passage  by the Township.  They are raising money for  lawyer, an architect and a planner.  The Coaster’s 11/14 edition has a report on this.

And there is talk that parking permit  planning will  resurface again after being defeated the last time.

Blogfinger wishes them all well.  We hope that the entire North End Redevelopment plan be litigated once again to restore the original 2007 zoning.  And as for parking permits, we have always been behind that, but our latest modification  is to agree that permits  only be activated between May and October.  And as for the “Better Parking Alliance,” did they totally give up?

 

Now to give you an idea of how we at Blogfinger have stuck our necks out  in the past, here is a post from nearly 10 years ago:

 

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger. 4//1/15:

The process of redeveloping the North End of Ocean Grove has been starting and stopping since the current plan (NERP) was approved with changed zoning in 2008, and a redeveloper (WAVE) was selected. The next step was to be a signed redevelopment agreement between the redeveloper and Neptune Township.

The last time negotiations re-started was before Sandy in 2012. After that, the process got sidetracked, and there was talk that the Camp Meeting wanted to change the plan to eliminate the underground garage. We have no independent confirmation of that, and the last word from the CMA, per Mr. Gradone, COO, is that they will proceed with the original plan. Mr. Gradone said in 2014 that the project was presently on the “front burner.”

Now there is speculation that the efforts to re-negotiate and sign a redevelopment agreement may soon be underway again. It should be noted that such an agreement must be based on the original 2008 plan. Although small changes could be made, any fundamental change such as substituting single family homes instead of condos, could require trashing the plan and starting the process over, including public meetings.

Because of the huge public interest in Ocean Grove regarding the North End project, it would be helpful if Mayor Jahn would report on the North End Redevelopment Plan’s progress at each Committee meeting. The public should be kept informed regarding this issue.

It is important that all Grovers read the October 12, 2012 editorial on Blogfinger which is linked under Jack Bredin’s comment (click “comments”below.)   That piece is very informative as are the 39 comments including some provocative ones by our (now) Mayor Mary Beth Jahn.

BILL WITHERS  (in honor of our new mayor who, we hope, will shine some light on  the process and update her 2012 Blogfinger remarks:)

Read Full Post »

South end beach in Ocean Grove after Dec. 9 2014 nor'easter.  Paul Goldfinger photo

South end beach in Ocean Grove after Dec. 9 2014 nor’easter. Paul Goldfinger photo ©

CMA logo

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

On December 9, 2014, the Jersey Shore got blasted by a nor’easter which produced several inches of rain and high winds. We went down to the Ocean Grove beach and found the beach and dunes to appear a bit wasted.

Four days ago, NJTV News posted a report from Mantoloking, Bay Head, and Ortley Beach (Toms River) regarding the sand and dune losses at those beach towns.  All three had less damage to their beaches than what might have occurred if they hadn’t provided post-Sandy protections, including  a steel wall,  a rock wall with 7 ton boulders, and a huge dune respectively.

Here is a link to that article:   NJTV link

In Ocean Grove, the Camp Meeting Association has been engineering the new beachfront to provide protections from future storms, including our own steel bulkhead, new dunes, and a new strong boardwalk design. 

 

We contacted William Bailey, Director of Operations at the OGCMA, and this is his reply:

“Paul, the nor’easter caused minimal sand loss, and we anticipate that it will once again build back up.  The “sad” dune photo you posted was of the south end dune that was established in the months following the hurricane.  That dune has remained as it is now, with little change other than more sand accumulating.

“The new dune process is from the Pier towards the boardwalk pavilion or between Heck and McClintock St.   Those dunes were not affected by the nor’easter;  in fact the newly established dunes along with the sand fence recently installed collected sand as designed, thus you will note there was no sand blown on the boardwalk or roadway.

“The dune work will be on going over the next year as more sand fence is installed and then dune grass plantings in the fall of 2015.”

William H Bailey

Director of Operations

 

AL JOLSON:   (we’re sending this out to Susan and Jim of OG who themselves are soon heading for the Golden State)

 

Read Full Post »

 

sign

 

Does the bus really need all that space?

These Blogfinger photos are  from Oct. 28, 2014  in front of the Ocean Grove Post Office.  Note the size of the “loading zone.”  ©

By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

A question arose here recently regarding access to the OG post office, among other postal issues.  Many of us read the sign in front of the post office   (“loading drop off zone”) and felt that we could pull in to drop off a letter or package at the post office.

Joe commented:   “Just so you know, that loading zone is the only place large trucks have to drop off for the various restaurants and stores on Main without impeding traffic.   I’ve seen the cops ticket people who park there, and their pleas of going into the post office fall on indifferent ears.”   Joe didn’t want his neighbors to get ticketed.

I went back to check the lay of the land and the wording of the sign.

Then I contacted the Traffic  Officer, NTPD, who was unsure of the answer to the inquiry.  He said that he had not heard of ticketing cars there.  He got back to us with this response:

“I checked with the Township.  That was put there for the bus stop when they are loading and unloading.  No one else is allowed to park there. ”

I don’t see the word “bus” on any of the signs shown above, and it seems easy to conclude that the signs refer to the post office.  And how about those trucks that Joe describes?  Have they been ticketed also?  Given the ambiguity of the signage, those citizens should have been given a pass by the police

Why not give the citizens two or three diagonal spaces for post office drop offs?  There  is room.  Buses don’t need that much space. They rarely come into town. In neighboring towns, the bus stops are marked with yellow curbs only and they are not very big.  Today I saw some cars parked in Asbury bus stops.

In Ocean Township, there is a small post office on a narrow congested street with no parking  (sort of like our Main Avenue).  But that town has set aside 4 spaces that permit 15 minute parking for the post office.  

Fairmont Avenue post office in Ocean Twp.  4 spaces reserved for patrons---15 minute parking. Blogfinger photo

Fairmont Avenue post office in Ocean Twp. 4 spaces reserved for patrons—15 minute parking. Blogfinger photo  click to read the sign.

Why is it that whenever an idea about parking is suggested by Ocean Grove taxpayers as they seek some relief,  they are consistently thrown under the bus and ignored by the Township?  

Is this a trivial matter? No. Small victories give rise to big victories.  

It’s time for the Township to favor the wishes of the people regarding parking,  as opposed to paying special attention to others such as tourists or merchants .  Remember  the design of the Main Avenue downtown which took away many parking spaces to allow expansion of outdoor dining?  

And what do we have here now—helping out the bus company to the detriment of the public?

BLIND BOYS OF ALABAMA with HANK WILLIAMS JUNIOR

Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger

Read Full Post »

(L to R):  J. Randy Bishop, Kevin McMillan, Mayor Michael  Brantley, Mary Beth Jahn, and Eric  Houghtaling  (Neptune web site photo)

(L to R): J. Randy Bishop, Kevin McMillan, Mayor Michael Brantley, Mary Beth Jahn, and Eric Houghtaling (Neptune web site photo)

The Committee meeting on September 22 was sparsely attended.  Michelle Gannon, Founder of Mary’s Place, was the first to go to the microphone during the public portion where anyone can have five minutes to speak.   She  made a statement to clarify the timetable of their approvals since, she says,  there have  been some differences in the reporting of those events. Her timetable can be found in the comments below yesterday’s post “What did they know and when did they know it?”

Joan Venezia of Mt. Hermon Way  in Ocean Grove  (and a Trustee of the HOA)  suggested that garbage pickup be changed to once per week instead of twice because the recyclable program has been so effective.  She promoted this idea as a way for the township to save money.  Committeeman Eric Houghtaling said that they would consider her idea, although he said that twice per week might still be needed in the summer.

Kevin Chambers of Ocean Grove read a statement about how the Township was violating the State RSIS laws.  We have heard his argument recently on Blogfinger as part of the conversation about the absence of  off street parking for Mary’s Place.

Note that the minutes of Township Committee meetings can be found online at Neptunetownship.org      (  Township website link  ) but usually there is some delay. The quickest way is to request an audio recording from the Clerk’s office.

 

Read Full Post »

On Blogfinger we are open to new ideas.

On Blogfinger we are open to new ideas.

September 7, 2014.  (Attention is called to the many comments which have been posted since this article first appeared on Sept 7.)   Just look down and click on “comments” to read them.

What do you all  think of this idea:

Each property tax payer in Ocean Grove is given only one  windshield sticker  allowing only those stickered  vehicles to be parked on the north side or west side of the streets in Ocean Grove from June 1st of the year until  September,  the day after the flea market?

This would require an ordinance allowing property tax payers to receive  Ocean Grove parking.

Joel T. Scranton

Ocean Grove, New Jersey

TEDDY THOMPSON  from the movie Brokeback Mountain

Should we allow this man of means to park his trailer in the Grove? 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts