
Jack Bredin (L), Kevin Chambers (R) and Paul Goldfinger (photographer) represented Ocean Grove at the SIAB in December 2015.
By Paul Goldfinger, Editor and Jack Bredin, reporter/researcher for Blogfinger.net (Ocean Grove, NJ)
The Site Improvement Advisory Board (SIAB) is a regulatory board, part of the N.J. Department of Community Affairs. The 12 appointed members meet quarterly to implement their task of regulating residential development in New Jersey. They concern themselves with matters such as streets/parking, storm-water management, water supply, and sanitary sewers. It provides engineering standards to ensure public health and safety.
Exceptions can be made to these standards (“A municipality or a developer may individually or jointly request a waiver from a provision of the RSIS from the Site Improvement Advisory Board by showing that adherence to a particular provision presents a danger to public health and safety.“)*
The 12 members are all professionals representing various groups including planners, engineers, Builders Association, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Div. of Codes and Standards, and others. This group is clearly devoted to protecting the citizens of New Jersey.
Remember when Neptune wanted to get an exception to the RSIS (Residential Site Improvement Standards) regarding parking in Ocean Grove which would allow the floodgates to open for condoization all over town, gridlock, and a worsening parking situation? So, when Blogfinger and some other Ocean Grove citizens showed up at that 12/15 meeting, the Neptuners took a look around and asked for their request to be cancelled. It has not re-appeared on the agenda since then.
But we expect that exceptions will be requested again by Neptune with respect to the North End Redevelopment Plan.
So today, October 18, 2018, Jack and I went to a meeting of the SIAB in Trenton. We were treated cordially by the Chairman Joseph Doyle,Jr and by John Lago, administrator. We were attracted to this meeting because of agenda items: committee reports on storm-water and streets/parking, parking decks and large surface lots. And we were pleased to see that the Board recognized us and were interested in why we were there.
We listened carefully to their discussions which were quite technical and not specifically about us, but it was important that the SIAB knows that Ocean Grove citizens have issues.
During the public portion, Jack stood up and read a statement which he wrote about Wesley Lake pollution and about the name change of that body of water. Jack reported that Neptune had instituted an “illegal” name change on the tax map. He asked for “guidance” from the board about this matter. We did not raise parking issues this time.
Chairman Doyle said the Wesley Lake matter was ” a very complicated issue,” but that his board could not “address it.” He and other board members did however respond to Jack’s statement that the name change violated the requirements of the DEP’s Green Acre program of which Wesley Lake is part.
Mr. Doyle recommended that the matter be taken up with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) because this may be a violation of State and Federal laws. At a personal level, the Chairman said that he has a home in Bradley Beach and was familiar with Ocean Grove and its lakes.
It is our belief that our ongoing relationship with the SIAB will help us monitor the efforts of Neptune Township to bypass regulations in Ocean Grove which also include zoning and land use improprieties. It will help to remind the SIAB that we are still around and active.
Note: If you Google the SIAB, the last Blogfinger post on this subject comes up high on the list. Also, a search of the BF search box on top will reveal some other posts about SIAB.
Blogfinger goes to Trenton in 2015
Wells, Jaworski and Liebman law firm*
BOB DYLAN:























Kevin Chambers Comments About Parking in the Grove (2011 post on Blogfinger)
Posted in Ocean Grove news, tagged Kevin Chambers comments on parking issues, MLULll in Ocean Grove, RSIS application in Ocean Grove, Special area standard in Ocean Grove, Zoning violations in Ocean Grove on November 21, 2015| 32 Comments »
Editor’s Note (2015) : Kevin Chambers is a long time Ocean Grover who has brought suit against Neptune Township regarding condominium projects in town.
Kevin has never, in the past, commented on Blogfinger, but he decided to join the discussion in 2011.
–This article was originally posted on BF in January 2011, but it is as relevant now as it was then. I think this 2011 post pretty much explains Kevin’s views in 2015, but perhaps we will hear from Kevin again now if he wants to bring us up to date with his views on zoning and parking in Ocean Grove.
—Note the interesting comments section from 2011 which can be added to now.
———Paul Goldfinger . Editor @Blogfinger
August 2013. Kevin Chambers, an OG historian, testifies at the HPC demolition hearing re: Whitfield Hotel on Surf Avenue. Paul Goldfinger photo ©
From Kevin Chambers of Ocean Grove:
The following is to address RSIS and parking in Ocean Grove:
In 1997 the State of New Jersey created the New Jersey Site Improvement Advisory Board that established “Residential Site Improvement Standards” (RSIS). RSIS is a part of the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL) that governs all zoning in the state of New Jersey. Every town in the state, including Neptune, was mandated to amend its zoning to conform to RSIS.
Neptune, when amending its Land Development Ordinance in 2000, violated the MLUL and RSIS when it created the Historic District Oceanfront (HD-0) zone.
The Historic District of Ocean Grove, a section of Neptune, is the only development in the entire state, in which the township that governs it refuses to enforce RSIS.
The state wrote three letters informing Neptune that it is required by law to enforce RSIS. Neptune, seeking a way to circumvent the law, created an ordinance that prohibits driveways and curb cuts for Ocean Grove. Believing that the new ordinance gave Neptune the right to ignore RSIS, the Township continued permitting the conversion of unauthorized nonconforming apartments and hotels into condominiums without providing parking.
The Township, still in violation of RSIS, was then forced into seeking a waiver known as the “Special Area Standard” designation from the State. Neptune believed that the designation would permit the Board of Adjustment to continue its abuse of granting improper high density development within Ocean Grove, which in turn has lead to more car congestion on the streets.
The RSIS Board explained to Neptune’s representatives, that if Neptune enforced RSIS within Ocean Grove that it would prohibit improper high density uses that would in turn lessen the density of cars on the streets.
If Neptune acted responsibly and brought its zoning for Ocean Grove into conformity with the MLUL it then wouldn’t need to seek the designation from the state. The enforcement of RSIS would break the vicious cycle of permitting greater density in Ocean Grove at the expense and the detriment to Ocean Grove residents.
Even though all the committee members of the RSIS Board were well aware of Ocean Grove’s problems having visited Ocean Grove, the RSIS Board was forced to deny Neptune the “Special Area Standard” designation since Neptune’s zoning for Ocean Grove was and is in violation of the MLUL.
Even more troubling, Neptune was in violation of the “Open Public Meeting Act” when it sought the designation. Neptune is now required to hold open public meetings in which to provide a legitimate parking study in order to establish a need to seek a waiver from the state. Neptune must also bring Ocean Grove’s zoning into compliance with the MLUL before reappearing before the RSIS Board.
Solving Ocean Grove’s high density and over crowding of the streets doesn’t take “brainpower or innovation;” it only takes following the law, the very law that every Committee member in the state is sworn to uphold.
To this very day, the Township continues to be in violation of the MLUL and continues to refuse to enforce RSIS. Both were created and designed for the protection of every resident of the state, including the residents of Ocean Grove. Every resident of Ocean Grove should be leery of any township committee person who hinders or who refuses to demand their enforcement.
Kevin Chambers
Editor’s credit: Top photo was taken at the Historical Society of Ocean Grove Museum. Blogfinger photo
Read Full Post »