By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger
In December 1992, a vicious nor’easter destroyed the Ocean Grove Boardwalk and Fishing Pier. FEMA, understanding that the Ocean Grove boardwalk was owned by a private non-profit group (The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association,) readily agreed to pay for the reconstruction of those beachfront structures.
After that, FEMA regulations were changed, many times, over the ensuing years. We don’t know exactly which/when regulatory changes affecting PNP’s (private non-profits) were put in place, but OG ended up being rejected by FEMA after Sandy, and we don’t know why those changes were made.
Ralph delCampo, interim COO of the OGCMA, in interviews with Blogfinger, said, at least twice, that we were suffering now because of rule changes made after Katrina hit New Orleans on August 29, 2005. New regulations were published in 2007.
Yet it seems that if we were eligible in 1992, then surely we should be eligible now. If our boardwalk was understood to be for the public good then, so why is it now written off as a “recreational facility?” Nothing has changed with respect to the Boardwalk’s functions. If there were problems after Katrina, how could that have been something that would cause the rejection of Ocean Grove now?
Consider this quote from the New York Times, last week; in an article about how the Governor has been recently criticized regarding his failure to rebuild after Sandy in many parts of the Shore and to return thousands of citizens to their homes:
“Mr. Christie has blamed the slowness of federal agencies for delays in getting money to residents, and said that New Jersey was paying for the sins from Hurricane Katrina, as the Federal Emergency Management Agency put up hurdles to prevent fraud.”
Again a reference to Katrina, this time from the Governor, and it is about fraud after Katrina. So how does Katrina fraud in New Orleans result in making OG ineligible for aid after Sandy?
Is it possible that Ocean Grove is being punished by being swept up in a storm of regulatory changes that weren’t meant to hurt places like the Grove? Perhaps the issue was also one of cost cutting, but why cut out our boardwalk when it was equally as deserving as all other boardwalks back in 1992? If cost is the concern, then why pay for every boardwalk except ours?
Here’s a quote from a FEMA regulatory statement dated 2007:
“FEMA policy 2007 ineligible PNP Facilities. ‘ Some PNP facilities that might have been assisted prior to 1993 are no longer eligible under the governing statutes and regulations. Examples include: recreation facilities, etc.’ “
We have complained on Blogfinger that OG has been treated unfairly. BF is not the only source of such complaints on behalf of the Grove. Below is a resolution from the NJ Legislature (the link is below)
The synopsis says: “…. urges the President and FEMA to ensure funding necessary to repair Ocean Grove’s boardwalk”
ASSEMBLY JOINT RESOLUTION
No. 103
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
215th LEGISLATURE
INTRODUCED APRIL 4, 2013
Sponsored by:
Assemblywoman MARY PAT ANGELINI
District 11 (Monmouth)
Assemblywoman CAROLINE CASAGRANDE
District 11 (Monmouth)
njleg resolution
When I appeared on a panel (BF Link to podcast ) recently to discuss our situation, Mark DiIonno, a Star Ledger columnist who was nominated for a Pulitzer this year said, referring to our denial by FEMA, “Their reasoning was absurd regarding the designation of the OG boards as ‘recreational,'”
He noted that every boardwalk in New Jersey was recreational in the same way that ours is. He referred to the “skewed reasoning of FEMA.”
Read Full Post »