• Home
  • About
  • Header Caption
  • Header info.
  • Photo Gallery. Paul Goldfinger photography.
  • Rules

Blogfinger

A Digital Breeze from the Jersey Shore

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pres. Obama to visit Jersey Shore with Gov Christie on Tuesday May 28.
“The sun will come out tomorrow,” sang Joan “Annie” Knust of Ocean Grove »

DID FEMA DISCRIMINATE AGAINST OCEAN GROVE?

May 25, 2013 by Blogfinger

fema

This is what three Ocean Grovers had to say on this subject just yesterday:

  OhGee:    “I made the point earlier on that the Boardwalk Pavilion issue was part of the reason FEMA denied the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association  (OGCMA).  I was poo-poo’d that issue had nothing to do with the denial. But I still question that it does. You can’t have it both ways, OGCMA.”

OG Jaimie:   “It’s my understanding that the CMA got funding after the early 90s Nor’ easter for repairs to the boardwalk, Auditorium, etc, by arguing – successfully – that despite the CMA’s mission/religious background, they were public facilities, open to the public for both secular and non-secular purposes. In between then and Sandy, certain members of the CMA made it clear that these facilities weren’t open to all members of the public, due to religious beliefs. Fool me once…?”

Doubting Thomas:  “Now that we know that the IRS has been targeting conservative and Christian organizations, such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and the Catholic League, why should we not suspect FEMA of turning Ocean Grove down because of similar bias?”

Editor’s Note: The first two commenters believe that FEMA denied the CMA’s application for Sandy aid because of the Pavilion episode in 2007 when the CMA was found by the State of New Jersey to have discriminated against a gay couple who wanted to have their civil ceremony in the Pavilion.  These two commenters don’t want to accept FEMA’s official  explanation that the denial has to do with the designation of the privately-owned boardwalk as a recreational venue.

Doubting Thomas suggested the possibility that FEMA might have targeted the CMA because of perceived political/ religious leanings.  He thinks that if the IRS could do it, why not FEMA.

If these theories are true, then FEMA officials need to be investigated, because their rulings cannot be based on religious or political considerations.  The fact that the State of New Jersey found that the CMA had discriminated during the Pavilion episode would not be a reason for this Federal agency to punish the citizens of Ocean Grove.     The FEMA rulings must be based only on their own unbiased and documented regulations.

It’s OK to speculate and have conspiratorial theories, but it is necessary to point out that there is not a shred of evidence to suggest that the FEMA denial has to do with anything other than  the official explanation.

The Camp Meeting Association has it right in responding to the denial with an appeal that has been filed by the book. That appeal argues that the FEMA rules need to be reassessed so that Ocean Grove taxpayers can have help for their boardwalk just like all the other towns around here, regardless of who owns the boardwalk.

—Paul Goldfinger, Editor  @Blogfinger

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Posted in Hurricane Sandy funding in Ocean Grove, Hurricane Sandy recovery | Tagged Did FEMA discriminate against the OGCMA? | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on May 26, 2013 at 10:33 pm Barbara Burns

    Disaster Assistance Policy 9521.3, Private Nonprofit (PNP) Facility Eligibility, effective as of July 18, 2007, describes the guidelines to be followed by FEMA personnel “involved in making eligibility determinations” under the Stafford Act. The boardwalk, while open to the general public, is “private” in that it is not owned by a public, i.e., governmental, entity. Certain privately owned facilities, for example, utilities, irrigation systems, medical facilities and custodial care facilities, are eligible for diaster assistance funding. Section VII B 5 of the policy lists facilities that are ineligible. Among the ineligible facilities are “recreational facilities”. FEMA says the boardwalk is a recreational facility. You may disagree (as I do), but, when considered in the context of the policy, FEMA’s determination is not unreasonable.


  2. on May 26, 2013 at 11:35 am Wisher

    The FEMA bias may have been in granting funds after an earlier storm, and the unbiased decision was made this time. There may have been a pro-Ocean Grove bias previously. The bias would have been giving public funds to a privately owned organization whose facilities were for recreational purposes but which promised that their facilities were available to all of the public. This time around, maybe FEMA just followed their rules to the letter.


  3. on May 25, 2013 at 12:25 pm Sue

    Maybe the Governor can walk the President into OG when he visits AP on Tuesday and note the FEMA issue.



Comments are closed.

  • Ocean Grove: a really cute small town at the Jersey Shore.

  • Recent comments

    Blogfinger on Spring Market 2026 reappears w…
    Blogfinger on A YouTube treat: Hauser and Ca…
    Blogfinger on Do you enjoy wandering among t…
    Peter Wool 5 Front C… on Do you enjoy wandering among t…
    Blogfinger on So why the long face?
  • Recent Blogfinger posts:

    • Viewpoint in Naples… May 23, 2026
    • Visualization 20/20 May 23, 2026
    • Nell’s garden at the OG beach by Bob Bowné… May 23, 2026
    • “Revenant” movie 19th century ….. May 22, 2026
    • Spring Market 2026 reappears with a worrisome flyer. (below) May 21, 2026
  • But who’s counting?

    • 4,880,758 hits
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 540 other subscribers

Powered by WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Discover more from Blogfinger

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Loading Comments...