By Paul Goldfinger, Editor @Blogfinger
June 27, 2017. The Wesley Lake Commission got off to a good start tonight when they began their meeting with a spirited discussion regarding the main cause of Wesley Lake pollution— storm water drainage from the streets of Neptune Township and Asbury Park. The Commission clearly didn’t know much about how to remediate the problem but they were anxious to learn.
They brought in a consultant from Maser Company of Red Bank, Joseph Raftery, P.E. He had been asked to review the results of Wesley Lake water quality monitoring.
He said that his company had one of their Ecological Services project managers review the data, and Raftery did a pretty good job of discussing the situation. But unfortunately he made a mistake that cast a cloud over his expertise. He insisted that Wesley Lake is “man- made.”
His report went on to say, “The water quality results are consistent with most man-made lakes in a coastal plain.” He said that the “storm water runoff that enters the Wesley Lake brings in nitrogen and phosphates, resulting in a retention pond and/or “sink.”
But Jack and I were concerned when he based his opinions on the notion that the Lake is man-made. We have studied the history which clearly shows that Wesley Lake was a natural body of water—an estuary—when the town was founded in 1869. We posted old maps that showed large streams entering from the west, and the Lake connecting to and draining naturally into the ocean. It is true that the Lake was dammed in the past, but water from the Lake still winds up in the ocean.
We have discussed trying to return the lake to an estuary—-ie its natural state. Raftery never used the E word.
As the meeting ended, Raftery tried to exit quickly, but I caught up with him and asked him why he characterized the Lake as being man-made. He refused to answer the question as he scurried down the stairs and out the door to the parking lot, saying that he “would not speak to a blog.” He knew that we were from Ocean Grove.
Why did he refuse to answer a legitimate question about his analysis? Why wouldn’t he speak to a citizen? Perhaps he is not the right engineer to be a consultant for a public entity such as the Commission.
His presentation is now all suspect.
THE CAMBRIDGE SINGERS. “For the Beauty of the Earth.” John Rutter
For the beauty of the earthFor the glory of the skiesFor the love which from our birthOver and around us liesOver and around us lies



