Sometimes it can look a little spooky. Photos by Paul Goldfinger. Left click on images to see them larger; then back arrow. This view is looking north from the OG side
By Charles Layton. Blogfinger.net. 2012
Just because the Casino is in disrepair doesn’t mean it’s not cool. The Parthenon is in disrepair, too, but it’s cool. Likewise the Coliseum in Rome. Likewise the Great Sphinx of Giza — it’s kind of run-down, but still…
Many Ocean Grovers amble through the Casino on a regular basis, either on daily walks or morning bike rides or en route to a boardwalk restaurant or other Asbury attraction. It’s as familiar to us as the Great Auditorium.
But don’t you sometimes wonder whether the Casino will remain as it is — a graffiti museum — in perpetuity? Does Asbury have plans for it? And if so, what are they?
Reporter Don Stine answers those questions in this week’s Coaster, and the answers are: No, there are no specific plans. However, yes, the city’s beachfront developer, Madison Marquette Investments, does intend to rehab the building. But not now. And apparently not soon.
And as for what it will one day become, that seems an open question.
Stine quotes Donald Sammet, Asbury’s director of redevelopment and planning, as saying that the beachfront developer is required, at some point, to turn the building into something. But not on any set schedule.
The president of Madison Marquette Investments, Gary Mottola, is quoted as saying his company “will develop the Casino at some point.”
Some of us aren’t getting any younger, Gary, and we’d really like to see the thing rehabbed before we shuffle off this mortal coil.
Stine writes that it was built “circa 1929″ and that the eastern portion – the part over the beach, which was razed in 2006 – was once an ice skating rink. What remains now is the old amusement area and carousel building on the western end.
Mottola said the building is structurally safe and that some of the architectural elements have been moved into storage.
Good thing it’s safe, because although it isn’t officially in use, people do in fact use it for many things. Street musicians set up in there from time to time. And as the photos below remind us, it can also serve as a sports palace, or even for a wedding celebration.
Even in its decrepitude, people really like it.
It’s a great place to take wedding photos. Paul Goldfinger photo. 2013
… or for a father-son hockey game… Paul Goldfinger photo.
Night light on the beach, between Ocean Grove and Bradley Beach. By Paul Goldfinger. Click to enlarge.
Paul Goldfinger, Editor, Blogfinger.net. Ocean Grove, NJ, USA.
We’re walking on the beach when we notice lights in the sky. It’s foggy, and the lights seem mysterious. We get closer and find people near the water launching delicate floating lanterns constructed of special paper and balsam wood. A tiny device is set afire inside causing it to glow brightly and heat the interior. Then the lantern is gently released. There is no string–it is free as a gull.
The paper lantern is pinkish white as it quickly floats up and out over the ocean, getting smaller and smaller in the night sky. It continues to be illuminated until it vanishes into the dark universe.
Place des Vosges, Paris. By Paul Goldfinger. Shot with film.
Those of you who follow this blog know that one of our themes is photography. We are interested in all sorts of photo works including news, Ocean Grove and fine arts. The bottom line is that we have high standards in terms of quality, but don’t worry about whether your pictures are good enough; if you like them, just email them to us and we will try to use them.
We like to show images of the Grove, especially those that capture the lifestyle of our unique town. Photography helps us dispel the stereotypes that, for example, would call us “Ocean Grave.” We encourage citizens to send us news photos or just pictures around town that illustrate something special. We tend not to use pictures of places that have been photographed thousands of times before, like the fishing pier or the Great Auditorium, but if you have an unusual take on those subjects, then try us.
One photographer said that she hadn’t send us pictures because she thought that we only posted scenics. The fact is that will consider any subject matter from any place.
One Grover, Erik Landsberg, who works at MOMA, was able to arrange for us to post an image by the great American artist Walker Evans which Evans had shot on Ocean Pathway; I think it was in the 1930’s. That was special. Sometimes we like to discuss the great masters and post their photographs along with those of amateurs.
If you have an image that is a print, lend it to us so that we can scan it for digital use. We also are interested in the unique opportunities offered by digital cameras, especially cell phones like the iPhone, which takes wonderful pictures, and you can experiment with photo apps.
Cell phone photograph with imaging app by Paul Goldfinger
We welcome your input. Go ahead, take your best shot and make our day.
Lifeguards at the Ocean Grove beach during tournament.. Paul Goldfinger photo (2014) Click to make bigger.
Ocean Grove Beach 2022. A professional photo shoot is taking place. Paul Goldfinger photo from the pier.. You can imagine the rear view. Where will she hang her beach badge? Nobody stopped the photographer.
By Paul Goldfinger, Editor, Blogfinger. 2021.
The OGCMA’s Beach Regulations have not been changed much since we first looked at them in 2021. We are going more or less by the rules expressed currently on the CMA web site: OceanGrove.org/beach. (2023)
A mailing was sent out in 2021 for those who wanted to obtain beach “tags” for 2022. If you ordered by mail, there would be a $7.00 mailing fee. You had to sign and return a card which promised that you would “follow all of the beach rules and regulations.”
In 2023 I ordered badges on line, and there were no rules to sign.. And the web site does not mention signing any rules pledge.
I wonder how many of you have actually read the rules. If you haven’t, here are some that are of particular interest.
Note that the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association controls most of these rules, not the Neptuners, even though the beach, boards, and parks are considered “public thoroughfares.” And it is not clear as to how the CMA enforces the rules. Note that the new pier has its own rules posted on the boardwalk.
The 2021 list below is stated somewhat differently now, but is essentially the same. Now they ban alcohol (a Neptune ordinance) and they don’t mention smoking. And there are rules about canopies or tents.
You can see the complete list at OceanGrove.org. Below are the rules and regs which we find particularly interesting at Blogfinger.net, and we editorialize about some of them:
You may not swim at the North End beach because it is reserved as the “primary surfing beach.” Is this fair?
You must “obey lifeguards at all times.” So if you are a sweet young thing in a bikini, you may not want to agree to this rule.
No electronic music unless you wear headphones. But how about other sources of noise such as loud parties or loud talk or sports radio?
Children under age 12 must be accompanied by an adult. Will you parents with precocious, brilliant kids restrain them from going to the beach without adults if lifeguards are present?
No disrobing or changing clothes on the beach. Heck, that is a popular spectator sport.
No burying persons below grade or in standing position. Does this mean that both the buryer and the buryee cannot be standing? Do the same rules apply if you are burying a dead person? No hole deeper than 12 inches. And what does “below grade” mean?
Sports fishing is allowed in “locations not being used for bathing or surfing.” Is this clear?
No flying kites over beach or boardwalk. Is that 24/7 or only while the lifeguards are there?
Only service dogs are allowed on the beach or boardwalk. Do they mean year-round? Dogs are permitted on-leash off-season.
No bikes, skateboards or skates except between 3 am to 10 am (Neptune ordinance in season) Why is Neptune Township writing this rule? The CMA is empowered to make rules for the beach and boardwalk. The CMA has jurisdiction over those areas.
No smoking on the beach. CMA allows smoking in their parks, but they probably made this specific area smoke-free because people pay to get on; they don’t pay to visit the parks, including Auditorium Square Park which, strangely, allows smoking despite the big wooden structure next door. I guess you can smoke on the boardwalk??
No activity which may endanger the safety of others.
No open fires, but the CMA has night bonfires.
No fishing in bathing areas. (? 24/7)
Beach badges if over 11 years old
Below is interesting in this age of thong bathing suits:
“The standard for the application of the terms ‘indecent exposure’, ‘inappropriate display’, ‘abusive act or language’ as used in the preceding sentence shall be generally accepted standard for the community of Ocean Grove in keeping with the stated purpose of the Association being to provide and maintain for members and friends of the Methodist Episcopal , now United Methodist Church,, a proper, convenient and desirable permanent Camp Meeting Grounds and Christian seaside resort.’”
But there are no such standards for the “community of Ocean Grove.” In fact there is no “community of Ocean Grove.” Perhaps the standards referenced are those of the Camp Meeting Association which do not exist in writing.
Therefore, the idea of “indecent exposure” cannot be enforced. Any lawyer want to weigh in on this?
So, who is the party of the first part? Well, you get the idea. There are more such rules and regulations; you have to decide which ones you want to obey fully, which ones you will gracefully ignore, and which ones you will obey selectively. We don’t claim to have posted every rule that exists; go to OceanGrove.org for more info.
But they did send one of their enforcement goons to demand that I stop photographing by the Pavilion and even on the beach.
Oh, and who gets to enforce all these rules, especially if they are 24/7?
And how does the CMA insure equal justice under the law? And how does Neptune get involved if their ordinances are challenged, such as no alcohol and bike/scooters violations?
JOHNNY DEPP and HELENA BONHAM CARTER “By the Sea” from Sweeney Todd-the Demon Barber of Fleet Street. Stephen Sondheim (music and lyrics 1979)
“By the sea, Mr. Todd, that’s the life I covet By the sea, Mr. Todd, ooh, I know you’d love it You and me, Mr. T, we could be alone In a house what we’d almost own
“Down by the sea, anything you say Wouldn’t that be smashing?
“With the sea at our gate, we’ll have kippered herring What have swum to us straight from the Straits of Bering Every night in the kip, when we’re through our kippers I’ll be there slipping off your slippers”
Paul Goldfinger, MD, Editor Blogfinger.net Click once to enlarge.
2021 re-post (The original question posited in the headline is still valid.)
There are multiple factions in the small town of Ocean Grove (pop 3,700,) and these organized groups are largely isolated from each other. Woven into the fabric are homeowners and renters who live here but do not belong to any organizations, thus becoming, by default, a faction of their own.
According to social scientist Steve Valk, whose family has lived here for several generations, it would be important for these factions to find ways to appreciate and cooperate with each other. For example he cites the religious groups and the secular groups which ought to find common ground for the benefit of the town. One example of such cooperation is the recent interaction, since Sandy, between Ocean Grove United (OGU) and the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association (CMA); however we have recently seen how tenuous that relationship is when we recall the recent clash about Sunday sermons.
The CMA ran the town from 1869 to 1980 as a tax paying part of Neptune Twp.—-111 years.
Neptune Township treated OG as a sort of gated community. The CMA made the rules and imposed blue laws until the N.J. Supreme Court put a stop to that in 1980 when Neptune took over active governance in the Grove (although the Neptuners were technically the governing body almost since the town’s founding.) Since 1980, the CMA has continued its mission and it has largely kept out of the way of Neptune Township.
But we now see the CMA and the Township working together on the North End Redevelopment Project, but suspicious elements have been revealed, and that project does not seem to be designed primarily with the town’s best interest at heart. By 2021, the CMA, OGNED, and the Neptunites seem to be on the verge of going ahead with the NERP.
As for the Neptune Township governance, you have seen the results of our recent poll which shows that 80% of respondents mistrust the Neptune Township Committee. Interestingly, over the years, there were times when the citizens rose up against Neptune control resulting in law suits and even a failed referendum to allow the Grove to become a separate town which it did for one year in 1925.
The other organizations here also tend to have their own agendas and to be run like private clubs. Such groups include the Homeowners Association, the Historical Society, Ocean Grove United, and the Chamber of Commerce.
They don’t work together very much for the good of the town. They are busy with their own agendas. For example, the Chamber of Commerce runs big events to try and drum up business for the merchants. But what do they do for the benefit of those who live here? We asked them to take over sponsorship of the Town-wide Yard Sale, but they refused.
When we introduced a new idea for the town—the Blogfinger Film Festival—a benefit for the boardwalk—-only a few of the members would be sponsors for the program, and hardly any attended the event.
When we think of factions in town, we can see the visible ones, but how about the invisible ones such as families that have lived here for generations and are part of networks that act in concert with each other, with the CMA, and with the Township governance, especially where land use, zoning, and parking are concerned. Let’s call that “the OG network of special interests.”
For them the town of Ocean Grove seems like a gift that keeps on giving. This network never speaks publicly, shows its face, or identifies itself, but what it does and has done will impact all of us and will determine what the town will be in the future. Take a look at all the Grovers who are involved with OGNED and will gain financially from that North End project; to the detriment of those of us who live here and pay taxes.
We have seen the results of favoritism for those special interests in the Greek Temple and Mary’s Place. The North End Redevelopment Project is a good example to keep an eye on. Who will be the winners, and who will be the losers?
Because of indifference by the public, organizations, and special interests, Ocean Grove may become an at-risk town which could end up a failed historic place without focus and character, such as is seen in other shore towns—unless the public pays attention and the organizations here begin to work together for the overall benefit of the town and not just on their narrow pet projects, like the Homeowners Association which is currently circulating a simple-minded parking survey while ignoring the improprieties and illegalities around town regarding land use issues. The HOA has teamed up with the Neptune Committee ever since 2008 when it supported 165 residential units, mostly condos, at the North End.
In 2002, a professor* at Monmouth University published an academic paper about OG history, emphasizing the powerful way that the activist HOA of 25-30 years ago fought for the town and saved its life. Below is a quote** from that research about that era.
Contrast the conclusion below with the current HOA which now is failing Ocean Grove through impotence, inaction, and lack of focus towards the issues which currently threaten our town the most.
The Home Groaners need to step up and save the town once again, but this version appears to so far be hopeless in that regard.
** 2002: “The HOA has maintained or reconstructed the carefully planned infrastructure of the founders, and even as Ocean Grove is being reborn as a contemporary tourist site, the HOA has worked with the CMA to preserve its sacred foundations. Just like the CMA, the HOA has been outstanding in its ability to secure what it wants and what it believes the community needs. Property values have risen, the community is again a safe place, tourism has been revived, an enormous amount of social capital has been generated, and the Victorian charm of the town has been restored.”
By Karen Schmelzkopf* in the Journal of Historical Geography, 2002