Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Ocean Grove Home Owners Association’

By Charles Layton

It looks as though, over the next couple of years, Asbury Park will resume construction of new beachfront townhouses and condominiums. But it will proceed more slowly and carefully this time to avoid the calamities that resulted from its fast-track development plans of the past.

There is a lesson here for Ocean Grove, as negotiations proceed over our own North End hotel/residential redevelopment plan.

Asbury Park had soaring ambitions in 2002 when it set out to revive its beachfront area. It drew up a $1.25 billion redevelopment plan that was to include 3,100 new residential units, mostly condos. But then, in the midst of construction, the housing market crashed. The Esperanza, a high-rise project that was to contain 224 luxury units next to the beachfront, was abandoned by its developer and foreclosed upon by its lender due to lack of sales. Wesley Grove, another condo project just across from Ocean Grove, also fell flat in the market. The developer only completed one of four planned phases, leaving a forest of unsightly wooden stumps in an open field where the rest of the homes would have been.

Last December, the City of Asbury Park took its master developer to court, accusing the developer of defaulting on its obligations. And three weeks ago an arbitrator ruled that the developer was not responsible for most of the delays and failures the city had cited. Instead, he declared, the primary failure was the city’s own fast-track plan, which was at odds with housing market reality.

“The market conditions in the United States, including New Jersey, during this time period were, and continue to be, extremely poor,” the arbitrator, retired federal judge Nicholas Politan, wrote. “Testimony elicited at the hearing supports the fact that there exists a housing market catastrophe. This is particularly true in areas primarily geared to seasonal and second home development.”

(Every realtor in Ocean Grove would probably say “amen” to that.)

And so, rather than allow the city to acquire a new master developer and plunge headlong, as before, Politan prescribed a more modest and prudent course. He ordered the developer to deliver plans this month for a new project – 28 townhouses at Asbury Avenue and Kingsley Street – and to complete those homes within about a year and a half. Once 50 percent of those units are sold, the developer could begin building 168 more units at Munroe and Cookman. Until 50 percent of those are sold, other proposed housing projects in the oceanfront redevelopment area would remain on hold.

How does all this affect Ocean Grove’s North End? Well, in the first place, besides a hotel, the North End plan includes as many as 85 residences, most of them condominiums. In the second place, as Politan says, the catastrophically bad housing market continues. And in the third place, the additional residences likely to come on line in Asbury, right across Wesley Lake from the North End, will be added competition for the North End condos — and in an already glutted market.

Last month, the Ocean Grove Home Owners Association approved a list of  suggestions for Neptune Township to consider as it negotiates a final agreement with the North End developers. One of its suggestions is a timetable somewhat like the one Politan is imposing on the Asbury Park developers. The HOA suggests that each block of condos should be 75 percent sold before the next block is started, “to insure no empty partially constructed structures.”

The wisdom of this suggestion is obvious.

A victim of the housing market, The Esperanza in Asbury was never finished. Photo by Mary Walton

Read Full Post »

By Charles Layton

On Saturday, members of the Ocean Grove Home Owners Association waded into the debate over whether Neptune Township should change its form of government. But as the arguments grew more heated — and also more substantive and interesting — the HOA president, Denis McCarthy, tried with limited success to close down the debate.

“This is not a debate here about alternative forms of government,” he told the members at one point. But it was clearly a discussion many audience members wanted to have, and they pressed on.

Warren Lapp, an invited guest speaker, was there to explain the merits of having a referendum this fall on the issue. But he too argued that the present question was not whether changing our government to a Mayor-Council system was a good or bad idea, but merely whether Neptune should put the issue to the voters in November.

Lapp is a member of NeptuneGovernment4All, which is gathering signatures on a petition calling for the referendum. The referendum would be required if the group gets 20 percent of Neptune’s 18,083 registered voters to sign its petition. If voters then approved it, Neptune would be bound to convert to a Mayor-Council system that would expand the number of elected officials from five to ten, including a full-time mayor. The township would also be bound to divide itself into six wards, with one Council member elected from each ward and three more elected at large. (At present, all five Township Committee members run at large.)

Denis McCarthy tells an audience member not to argue about alternative forms of government. Warren Lapp (L). Photo by David Layton.

The debate grew heated as Committeeman Randy Bishop of Ocean Grove, speaking from the audience, began questioning the implications of a ward system. Although proponents have argued that Ocean Grove would receive better representation by having its own ward, Bishop contends that Ocean Grove is only large enough to constitute two-thirds of a ward; it would therefore have to be merged with part of the Midtown neighborhood to form a ward.

Kennedy Buckley, an HOA trustee, said he thought some parts of the change-of-government proposal sounded good, but that a full-time mayor and five more members of the governing body would mean a more costly government. Lapp disputed that. “The cost of government is not in the number of people in government, it’s in the efficiency of government,” he said. However, the question of how a Mayor-Council structure might improve the workings of government was not addressed.

Members of the audience continued to return to the question of exactly how a ward system would work and whether it would help or hurt Ocean Grove. Ann Horan, the HOA’s treasurer, said “we’re not Ocean Grove anymore” if we have to share a ward with Midtown, which lies to the west of Ocean Grove, just across the train tracks.

State law requires that when a political entity is divided into wards, those wards must be contiguous and approximately equal in size. “Because we’re contiguous to Midtown,” said HOA member Norm Goldman, “that’s who we’d be lumped in with.”

“That’s misinformation,” Lapp said. He did not explain what other area might be joined with Ocean Grove to form a ward.

Lapp said the people gathering petition signatures had found widespread approval for the idea of having a full-time, directly-elected mayor.

“We have to have our signatures by next weekend,” he said. “It’s going to be a hell of a task” to meet that deadline.

The petition must be presented to county election officials by September 2 — 60 days before the elections. However, the deadline is actually much shorter, because time is required for the Neptune municipal clerk’s office to process and verify the signatures.

Lapp did not say now many signatures his group has gathered so far.

Before Lapp’s presentation, HOA trustee Barbara Burns gave an explanation of the different forms of local government New Jersey law allows. She recommended two Internet links which she said were especially informative: the New Jersey League of Municipalities and Rutgers University/Center for Government Services.

Lapp’s group also has a website: http://www.ng4a.net.

Read Full Post »

By Charles Layton, Blogfinger staff reporter.  2011.

By a voice vote, with no nays, the Ocean Grove Home Owners Association approved a North End resolution Saturday containing a long list of suggestions aimed at easing the project’s inconvenience for Ocean Grovers.

The North End Redevelopment promises to be the most massive building project in Ocean Grove for many decades. As presently planned, it calls for a maximum of 80 hotel rooms and a maximum of 85 residences, mainly condos with a few single-family homes.

The Township Committee has already enacted an ordinance describing the project’s outlines, but now the Committee must negotiate with the developers on a much more detailed agreement, which also is to be enacted into law.

The HOA’s list of suggestions will be passed along to the Township’s negotiators, who are Committeeman Randy Bishop and Committeewoman Mary Beth Jahn.

In general, the HOA hopes to mitigate the adverse impact of the project on the lives of Ocean Grovers both during construction and thereafter. The organization’s proposals therefore emphasize the need to prevent parking and traffic problems as a result of the increase in density at the North End.

The proposal also calls for a maximum of transparency, including publication on the Township’s website of all relevant findings and reports, especially those related to traffic, environmental impact and the nature of the water table at the site. (Problems with the water table could affect the developers’ ability to provide the necessary amount of underground parking.)

It also calls for public release of information relating to the developers’ financial ability to complete the project. It asks that the developers be made to build the complex in stages, beginning with the hotel, followed by the single-family homes and then the condo units. “Each block of condos must be 75% sold before other condos are started to insure no empty partially constructed structures,” the resolution says. These suggestions are intended to avoid the fate that befell Asbury Park when a developer began construction on a large condo project only to have the project fail financially, leaving a large, ugly skeleton of an unfinished building.

The HOA also asks that a swimming pool be included in the complex, with public access.

The developers of the North End are the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association and a company headed by Ocean Grove contractors William and Paul Gannon. Other investors in the Gannon company are unknown, and the HOA resolution urges that the Township require that they be identified.

There has been no indication as to how long the Township/developer negotiations might take, or how long before construction begins.

 

BACKGROUND —  Here are some basic facts about the North End Redevelopment Plan, as presently written. During negotiations, however, some of these details could change:

*Location: Between Spray Avenue and Wesley Lake, from the boardwalk west to Beach Avenue

*Elements: a hotel, condos, a few single family detached homes, townhouses, retail commercial space

*Maximum number of hotel rooms allowed: 80

*Maximum number of residences of all types: 85

*Off-street parking requirements: one space per hotel room; approximately two spaces per condo unit (in compliance with state RSIS standards); one space for each 300 square feet of banquet, conference or restaurant space in the hotel.

*Other parking requirements: Off-street parking for the hotel and residential structures must be below ground and sheltered from street view, although the below-ground lot or lots may rise a maximum of 3.5 feet above street level. A maximum of 20 surface parking spaces are permitted for loading, valet and pickup/drop-off, provided these spaces are screened from public view. Any existing on-street parking spaces eliminated due to the development must be compensated for with additional on-site spaces.

*Height limitations: Hotel no higher than 65 feet. Condo buildings no higher than 48 feet.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts