• Home
  • About
  • Header Caption
  • Header info.
  • Photo Gallery. Paul Goldfinger photography.
  • Rules

Blogfinger

A Digital Breeze from the Jersey Shore

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« BlackWhite Gallery
Color Gallery »

Vandalism Defendants Seeking a Deal to Avoid Indictment, a Criminal Record and Possible Prison Time

July 24, 2012 by Blogfinger

By Charles Layton

The four adults accused of a months-long spree of rock-throwing vandalism in Ocean Grove and elsewhere plan to apply to Pretrial Intervention, a program designed for first-time offenders.

According to a letter from the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office, the program “will include community service as well [as] an agreement to pay full restitution to all victims over a period of time.”

If the four defendants are allowed into this program, and if they comply fully with its conditions, they “will have the opportunity to have the matter dismissed,” the letter says. This would spare the defendants the stigma of a criminal conviction. “Should anyone fail to comply with conditions imposed by the program, then he/she will be facing an indictable conviction for a third-degree crime,” the letter says.

A third-degree crime in New Jersey can draw a sentence of 3 to 5 years in prison plus a large fine.

The four adult defendants are charged with criminal mischief. (A fifth defendant is a juvenile.) Police have said that during the past winter and spring the defendants cruised around numerous towns late at night, smashing the windows of homes and parked cars and committing other acts of vandalism. More than 150 of these incidents were reported in more than 20 towns, all of them, except Brick, in Monmouth County.

Neptune Police have cited 33 acts of window smashing in Ocean Grove alone from January through March.

The prosecutor’s office had earlier contacted the victims of these crimes by mail, asking for details, including receipts for repair of damages. This information has served as a basis for plea bargain negotiations with the four adult defendants.

In its latest letter, explaining the Pretrial Intervention Program, the prosecutor’s office informs the victims that they “are entitled to input on the disposition of the case.”

One victim we spoke with was unhappy at the prospect of having the defendants treated as first-time offenders. “The first time they threw a rock was the first offense,” this person said, “but the 150th time?”

The four defendants in question are Philip David Williams, 24; James Joseph Turetzkin, 19; Lauren Ashley Magaw, 21, and Tyler Emmons, 18. All are from Neptune Township except Turetzkin, who is from Neptune City.

These defendants had been scheduled for a pre-indictment court appearance on June 14, but that court date has been postponed until August 9 to give more time for negotiations aimed at a settlement. If no settlement is reached and the defendants do not plead guilty, the case would go before a grand jury and, in the event of an indictment, be tried by a jury.

New Jersey’s Pretrial Intervention Program provides defendants, generally first-time offenders, an opportunity for alternatives to traditional criminal prosecution. According to an online explanation provided by the state (go here to read it) the PTI program “is based on a rehabilitative model that recognizes that there may be an apparent causal connection between the offense charged and the rehabilitative needs of a defendant. Further, the rehabilitative model emphasizes that social, cultural, and economic conditions often result in a defendant’s decision to commit crime… Any defendant who is charged with an indictable offense may apply.”

For previous stories, containing more background on this case, go here and here.

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Posted in Blogfinger News, Neptune Township News, Ocean Grove news | Tagged crime in Ocean Grove, monmouth county prosecutor, rock throwing vandalism | 7 Comments

7 Responses

  1. on July 25, 2012 at 11:43 am Jason

    I would strongly suggest that those who were victims of these crimes contact the prosecutor’s office and make it clear that simple repayment for damages caused is insufficient penalty. Demand some jail time.

    I saw one of the cars that was damaged and it is appalling that those who did this may get away with no criminal record.


  2. on July 25, 2012 at 8:32 am Locust

    Wow. If you have a checkbook and its a non-violent crime, there are no consequences! Maybe we should all run out and steal some plasma TVs. If we get caught, then we’ll just pay for them and all is forgiven.


  3. on July 25, 2012 at 2:24 am Bullets

    These are nonviolent crimes, so prison time is not a major concern in an already crowded system.

    While the possibility existed that someone might have been hurt, that didn’t happen, no one was injured.

    As long as the victims get paid…


  4. on July 25, 2012 at 12:16 am Bythesea

    If you can simply buy your way out of trouble when you have committed a crime many times in many communities over months, then our legal system is bankrupt. This was cold, calculated vandalism on an epic scale. No one should be able to simply make a payoff and get away with it. I agree with the above that some prison time is in order.


  5. on July 24, 2012 at 3:55 pm Grounded in Reality

    Let’s hope we don’t have a liberal, weak-kneed prosecutor who will not hold these criminals accountable. These folks went on a multi-month rampage of destruction without remorse (not a singular instance of bad judgement). Someone could have easily gotten hurt — especially with the rocks thrown at houses. How could anyone think that they should be able to buy-off/bribe to avoid punishment. Restitution is not punishment, as daddy just writes a check. That really teaches criminals a lesson!

    These folks need a few years in prison — otherwise the whole system is a joke — and the next criminal will think that they too can get away with almost anything if they just write a check and say they are sorry.

    Honestly, with the videotaped confessions, being caught in the act, rocks in the car, and all, why is law enforcement even entertaining a discussion about this crime wave? There never was a more open and shut case.


  6. on July 24, 2012 at 2:12 pm I. Agree

    I agree with the comment made by one of the victims. This is not a first offense. The criminal acts were repeated over the course of a few months and on many separate occasions. I hope the prosecutor takes this into account.


  7. on July 24, 2012 at 11:49 am just curious

    Just curious…but are these defendants being represented by private counsel or a public defender? It seems to me if they have the money to pay for their own attorney then they would have the money to make full and immediate restitution…none of this “over a period of time” nonsense.
    Also there should be some jail time and yes they should have a record.
    Does anyone doubt that had they not been caught they would still be committing these acts?



Comments are closed.

  • Ocean Grove: a really cute small town at the Jersey Shore.

  • Recent comments

    Blogfinger on Meet Nancy and Seamus: new Gro…
    Blogfinger on “Little Gem.” A ne…
    Bill D on “Little Gem.” A ne…
    Blogfinger on The “Fabelmans.” S…
    Blogfinger on A fuss and a word salad erupt…
  • Recent Blogfinger posts:

    • Brooklyn, New York: Daddy’s Little Girls April 4, 2026
    • MaryLou sends us all flowers for springtime. April 4, 2026
    • Family fun in the Grove… April 3, 2026
    • I’ll take Manhattan… April 3, 2026
    • “Little Gem.” A new restaurant opens in Avon-By-The-Sea. April 3, 2026
  • But who’s counting?

    • 4,859,955 hits
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 535 other subscribers

Powered by WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Discover more from Blogfinger

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading