• Home
  • About
  • Header Caption
  • Header info.
  • Photo Gallery. Paul Goldfinger photography.
  • Rules

Blogfinger

A Digital Breeze from the Jersey Shore

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Letter to the Editor. Re: What are urns and what about Sunday beach closings?
Magical moments in the Great Auditorium: Garrison Keillor. Re-post from 7/29/15. »

Short shorts from the North End redevelopment zone

July 30, 2015 by Blogfinger

Where OG ends, and AP begins.  This part of the boardwalk runs through the center of the North End Redevelop. zone.  Blogfinger photo ©

Where OG ends, and AP begins. Looking south.  This part of the boardwalk runs through the center of the North End Redevelopment zone, but who controls the design?—FEMA or WAVE?   We’re looking forward to the elevation drawings. Blogfinger photo ©

News from the North End redevelopment zone continues to emerge, and Blogfinger will share it with you in small doses to help with the digestion.

The New Jersey Redevelopment and Housing Law says, “All agreements, from or between a municipality and to or with a redeveloper shall contain a covenant requiring that the owner shall construct only the uses established in the current redevelopment plan.”   (Which is the NERP from 2008)

On June 5, 2015, Jennifer Krimko, attorney for WAVE, sent an email to Gene Anthony, attorney for Neptune Township regarding the “North End Redevelopment.”

In that email, she promised him a “mark up of the draft Redevelopment Agreement.”

At the Neptune Township Committee meeting on Monday, July 27, Jack Bredin went to the microphone and asked the Mayor if there was a Redevelopment Agreement for the North End.

The question was answered by Mr. Anthony who said, “No.” He also said that any Redevelopment Agreement would have to relate to the 2008 Plan, not to any subsequent unofficial revisions.

At a recent workshop meeting Committeeman Randy Bishop had introduced a new redevelopment plan that was prepared by WAVE.  Mr. Anthony is correct regarding a contract for the new plan, because there never was a signed agreement for the Committee’s 2008 plan.

The Committee cannot amend a non-existing agreement and the Committee cannot sign a redeveloper’s agreement for WAVE’s proposed new plan without starting the whole process from the beginning.

THE HOT SARDINES

https://blogfinger.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/1-10-lets-go.mp3

—Paul Goldfinger, editor @Blogfinger

—Credit:  Jack Bredin, researcher.

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Posted in Blogfinger Presents | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on July 31, 2015 at 5:28 pm Peter Piper

    I can not wait for the Atlantic to get rid of that white whale building. Just when is that building and that eyesore ex-casino next to it coming down? Asbury and the Grove should see one another without any useless structures in view.

    Editor’s note: The white whale is missing from the latest purchase agreement because it is privately owned. The latest unofficial plan calls for condos, stores,and catering hall in that 2 1/2 story building.

    The developers of A. Park have future plans for the Casino, but it is far from the top of their list. In the NERP there is talk of a transition element, i.e. something like a monument to demarcate where the two towns meet, but we don’t know if that is still in the plan. Any developer who will be doing the developing according to the NERP 2008 will have to include such an element. ——Paul


  2. on July 31, 2015 at 11:38 am Jack Bredin

    I don’t see any path to move the 2008 plan forward, and WAVE has presented no criteria to support the new 2015 plan.



Comments are closed.

  • Ocean Grove: a really cute small town at the Jersey Shore.

  • Recent comments

    Blogfinger on Blobfinger quickees:…
    Blogfinger on “Dirty Dancing”…
    Frank S on Modern OG history—…
    Frank on “Dirty Dancing”…
    Blogfinger on Meet Nancy and Seamus: new Gro…
  • Recent Blogfinger posts:

    • Blabfinger report. April 08, 2026 April 8, 2026
    • Can you hear Gypsy violins? Their music says “romance.” April 8, 2026
    • Modern OG history—-2004: “Foggy, wet and dark” —-Virginia Smith reports from the beachfront. April 8, 2026
    • Modern OG history—-2017. Reading the tea leaves: Where does the parking issue go now? April 8, 2026
    • Modern OG history—–1960: Girls in their summer clothes: not a new idea in 21st century Ocean Grove. April 7, 2026
  • But who’s counting?

    • 4,861,638 hits
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 535 other subscribers

Powered by WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Discover more from Blogfinger

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

 

Loading Comments...