By Paul Goldfinger, MD, FACC. Editor at BLOGFINGER.net.
From the AMA November, 2018:
“The dysfunctional U.S. health system may be working to improve hospital and payer bottom lines, but it’s not working as intended for patients or the doctors that care for them,” according to the head of the country’s largest physician organization.
At the AMA’s interim meeting, American Medical Association President Barbara L. McAneny, M.D., said, “The healthcare system often gets in the way of actual healthcare. This can be seen in payer issues, such as restrictive prior authorization and the industry’s ongoing appetite for consolidation,” she said.
If we look back to prior Blogfinger posts on this subject, starting in 2013, our 2014 and 2016 updates are of particular interest. The comments from readers are particularly enlightening, and my concerns remain valid.
BF ACA post two years ago, but still relevant
3 years ago I said on Blogfinger, “Some of you have berated me for having a negative attitude regarding Obamacare. The truth is that many good things will come out of our new healthcare system, but I am alarmed by the negatives which continue to slowly drip out the cracks and insinuate themselves seemingly overnight and unannounced into our experiences with doctors, hospitals, drug companies, etc. I am concerned that the negatives will outweigh the positives and cause damage to our loved ones as they seek care.”
2 years ago I said on BF: “When Obamacare first was passed, I wrote a series of articles on Blogfinger predicting that this new healthcare system would compromise the doctor-patient relationship and would reduce quality of care. I sensed that early, because it was clear that doctors would not be able to provide highly individualized care, as they have been trained to do. Maybe formalized care using guidelines and physician extenders would work for most medical issues, but it is those cases with the quirky and concealed elements that separates the men from the boys in medicine, and then mistakes are made and patients can suffer.
How do doctors feel about their jobs in 2016?
In 2018 we have been focusing on a number of related issues:
a. Republicans have been talking about repeal of the ACA, but in view of the recent election giving the Dems control of the House, that won’t occur.
b. The use of “mid-level” providers (MLP’s) such as PA’s and NP’s has soared across the country, both in doctors’ offices and in hospitals. A recent report found that office visits to such providers (usually functioning as primary care professionals) have gone up 129% in primary care offices, while visits to primary care doctors have dropped about 18%.
Surprisingly, the fees paid for these mid-level providers are not much different than the fees for primary care office visits with physicians. So the cost savings may not be there. This seems to be more about dealing with physician shortages and physician burnout. In some states, such MLP’s are allowed to open their own offices. But who’s to say that all this lower level care is good for quality?
c. Another change is the implementation of “team care” in hospitals where MLP’s and medical assistants follow protocols such that doctors are not needed for certain steps in a process, such as trauma care. I believe that this is potentially dangerous especially when acute care situations are concerned.
d. These physician “alternates” are supposed to free up physicians for more complicated tasks, but it does not always work that way. The AMA has stressed that all these new patterns of care must be be supervised by physicians, but that often does not work that way either.
I remain concerned about quality of care. These new approaches may result in more mistakes being made, but I haven’t seen any studies that look into that.
However, I have had personal experiences with this topic, and others tell me about their own worrisome events. There is reason to be suspicious, and all patients need to be alert, informed and willing to question. Here are some recent concerns:
—-Electronic medical records are improving, but they don’t live up to the promise so far.
—-Communication between doctors has deteriorated. Electronic check lists are passed around, but not enough person to person conversations are occurring, even as healthcare continues to become more complex. Important facts do fall between the cracks.
—-It is difficult for patients to speak to physicians. Instead the patient is forced to talk to a MLP, and the physician may be cut out of the loop altogether, and some issues may be missed.
—Medical offices are more likely to be run by corporate efficiency experts who may not even discuss practice procedures with physicians who know best what quality care requires, but they may be powerless employees. This results in physician cynicism, frustration, and early retirements.
——There are too many routine office visits and routine testing done. It seems like every doctor has some sort of shtick (ie procedure or excuse for an office visit) which may not be necessary. It often looks like churning to make up for declining reimbursements. One specialist told me that his group is requiring that he conduct 10 minute office visits—outrageous!
For example, Medicare patients who are doing well must return for office visits but now, in addition, there are prevention visits to go over information that could be taken care of at a routine visit. If Medicare weren’t paying for these special visits, they would not be deemed essential.
I love Dr. McAneny’s quote, “The healthcare system often gets in the way of actual healthcare.” This a very insightful remark, and we all need to remember what she said, and keep our eyes open.
Not for Everybody: Thank you for your comment.
As a physician, it is my primary duty to be sure that patients receive quality care, so expressing that concern is appropriate and does not mean that I am opposed to progress, electronic health records, physician extenders, management practices, technology, teamwork, or evidence based guidelines.
I agree with your points here but you seem to be missing the greatest threat to the health system—-Physician burnout. Greater than 50 % of docs report a feature of burnout. The leading cause EHR (electronic health records;) and on average the additional 6 hours of documentation done once our patients leave the office.
Caring for a lot of patients efficiently is a major undertaking. What do you want to do – deny people insurance and access to care because there are not enough physicians to provide care with 50 year old management processes?
It seems like your definition of quality is that the physician can order whatever he or she wants based upon their individual assessment, and that teamwork using extenders is an imposition on the medical profession.
A more appropriate definition of quality is “conformance to standards”. Take a look at Crosby’s famous book, Quality is Free. It might improve your perspective. As for practice guidelines, 35 years ago every physician I talked to called it “cookbook medicine”. 10 years ago (when I left the industry), guidelines were selling like hotcakes because doctors wanted them. Physicians wanted easy access to evidence-based information about best practices. I don’t disagree that it’s a tough situation for the medical profession.
There is a lot of burnout, and the insurance industry makes life miserable. (Read Atul Gawande’s article about the electronic record in last week’s New Yorker).
But I think your perspective is a little outdated. The health care industry and patients will be much better served as management practices and technology used by other industries is adopted.