By Charles Layton
Could the Broadway drainage project turn out a failure?
That’s what worried large numbers of Ocean Grovers at Monday night’s Township Committee meeting.
Although this $1 million construction project has plowed up large portions of Broadway, closed the street to traffic for much of the summer and brought noise, trash, dirt and anxiety to residents, many said that, after all that hassle, they doubted the project would fix their perennial flooding problem.
As one resident after another paraded to the microphone to question and complain, it became clear that a major factual disagreement existed between the Township officials and some of those residents.
Township officials contend that the main cause of the August 15 flash flood and a lesser but still significant flash flood on Monday was a partial blockage at Broadway and Central — a blockage that, once corrected, will no longer impede storm water flowing toward outlets at Fletcher Lake.
Some residents weren’t buying that story. They said the problem isn’t a temporary, rectifiable choke point at the Central Avenue intersection; rather, it’s that the entire recently-installed system of underground drainage pipes is too small to handle runoff from a normal summer rain.
Francis Paladino, who lives at 69½ Broadway and is chairman of the OG Sewerage Authority and a former president of the OG Home Owners Association, said that on Monday the water was 18 inches deep along his curb. He said from his own observation of the two recent floods he had concluded that the drainpipes newly installed along the length of Broadway were simply too small, and that this was why the street continued to flood.
“We’d better take a look and go back to the drawing board,” he told the Committee.
Allan Ellgren, who lives at 55 Broadway, told the Committee that he felt “the project is not going to work.” In fact, he said, since the Township began installing the new system, the flooding problem has grown worse.
“I wanted to sell my house. I took it off the market,” he said. “I can’t sell my house without telling the prospective buyer that there’s a flooding problem.”
Eric Tellefsen, owner of The Sea Spray, a B&B at Beach Avenue and Broadway, said “there’s probably five times the volume of water coming down Beach than has ever been seen before.” He said his and his wife’s downstairs living quarters had been flooded repeatedly this year and “we can no longer live there.”
Marilyn Laverty, who has resided on Broadway for nine years, said the recent flooding was “directly related to this project… We’ve had rains as heavy in the past, with less flooding.”
Leanne Hoffmann, Neptune’s director of engineering and planning, said the work at Beach Avenue “isn’t complete yet.” The solution to Tellefsen’s problem, she said, will be the addition of two more grates on Beach, which should be installed by the end of September.
Hoffmann and Township engineer Peter Avakian both said another major remaining task is to replace the old box culvert underneath Broadway at Central. This culvert unexpectedly collapsed on Tuesday of last week, and it was this, Avakian said, that had caused water to back up all down the street. It will take approximately two weeks before the contractor can begin replacing that compromised culvert, Hoffmann said.
Paladino maintained that these fixes won’t solve the problem. Although broken, the old box culvert was carrying all the water that flowed into it on Monday, he said, and in fact it was only “running about half full” because that was all the water the upstream pipes could deliver to it. He said he had personally witnessed this.
Even though Township officials predicted that things would soon be better, they did appear to be scaling back expectations of how well the new system will perform. Whereas Paladino, who has followed the project since its inception, maintained that its original goal “was to eliminate the flooding on Broadway,” Avakian said the system “won’t take all the water” that flows down Broadway. The project will only be able to handle “a two-, five-, ten-, up to a 25-year storm,” he said. Officials said both this week’s and last week’s rains qualified as 25-year storms.
(It is, in fact, possible to have two 25-year rainstorms in the space of a few days; technically, this term means that every year there is a 1-in-25 chance of one of those storms occurring. However, Paladino and Ellgren contended that the two recent cloudbursts were normal summer rains.)
One of the reasons more runoff seems to be pouring down to Broadway these days is that a previous outlet, which took water from Main Avenue beneath the boardwalk and into the ocean, has been eliminated. The water that used to take that route to the ocean now flows south from Main toward Broadway.
Several residents wondered whether the Township intended, once the project is completed, to restore Broadway from its current trashed-up condition to its former beauty as one of Ocean Grove’s showplace boulevards. Mayor Randy Bishop promised that this would be done.
I hope, if this project is proven a success; that these same doubting Thomas-es will applaud the Township.
I was also disappointed that Grovers could just not understand that:
A) The project isn’t done, what with the extra delays from unknown utility problems, etc. No one guarantees perfection in this world.
B) The Township’s hands are tied as far as putting extra handicapped ramps in, because they would not fit the requirements.
Would the residents like to pay for those ramps themselves and have them be poorly designed or the Township use eminent domain to confiscate those corner homes and properties so that we can get Federal $ and build them to the requirements the Fed mandates? I’m handicapped, but I understand reality.
C) Am also disappointed that several people did not understand or want to accept mandated NJ state bidding rules that require the acceptance of the lowest bid.
My gosh, the Mayor told you he was disappointed with the contractor, but the Township had NO choice.
D) Several times the Mayor said that the median would be restored and yet, people harped on that.
It’s a construction zone. I wonder how if any of the complainers ever lived in or bought one of the first homes in a large development being built. It’s like that for years.
One man’s opinion.
Even if low bid is required, what were the specifications and how did the Township determine their adequacy?
Yes, the project is not complete and all may end well. But let’s assume it will be a failure. Does anyone know how it would be rectified? What is our recourse as property owners? I don’t know the answer to these questions. We waited a long time for this project, and are now faced with the possibility of major rework IF indeed that can be funded.
After the Midtown Elementary School disaster, what are we to think?
For those of our readers who were not at Monday night’s meeting, the above comments about the bidding on the contract refer to statements made by Mayor Bishop and Leanne Hoffmann. Both those officials said they were unhappy with the contractor and only chose him because, by law, they were obligated to take the lowest responsible bid. “We are bound by contracting law,” Bishop said. Hoffmann said the contractor was not easy to work with. “It’s a daily struggle with him to keep the site clean,” she said.
Sounds like someone is trying to justify a bad plan, idea, contractor, underground system whatever?? Those rain storms the past few weeks were not 25-year storms. They were heavy normal summer thunderstorms.
I.M.H.O.
I have to disagree with Bishop. The township doesn’t have to take the lowest bid by law. I would like to see this law. If for example the middle bid has a better track record, and can justify their charges, there is no law that says you cannot take their bid.
Sometimes a bid can be low balled knowing that there will be unforeseen additional costs or upgrades that will compensate for the low bid.
http://www.njslom.org/magart0607_pg34.html
That’s the link to the laws concerning public bidding.
I didn’t know we had so many engineers living on Broadway.
Keep in mind we now have low bidder laws because we used to have “pay-to-play” awarding of contracts. Nobody was held accountable in those days.
Gosh was right on the money because the township had the ability to throw out all of the bids under 5 different stipulations including the cost of the project. I would imagine that the cost of the project now has exceeded the original plans but was the bidder or “winner” of this project a company which could also give the services as other bidders within the same financial parameters. If you were looking for a good heart surgeon to operate on yourself, do you go to the lowest bidder because of pricing or one who may be somewhat more expensive but has a greater reputation of saving your life????