• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Gallery

Blogfinger

A Digital Breeze from the Jersey Shore

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Blogfinger Grammarian: How Hot Is It?
Neighborhood Watch Update: 3 Bikes Stolen »

U.S. Camera and “Figure Photography”

July 18, 2012 by Blogfinger

July 1951. It wasn’t “cheesecake” if it appeared in U.S. Camera

By Paul Goldfinger, photography editor @Blogfinger

Recently Charles Layton wrote an article for Blogfinger about an archaic term “cheesecake” as it refers to “girlie photos.”  Link to BF cheesecake article  He posted a picture of Betty Grable in a bathing suit–an example of a World War II “pinup.”   Of course, now we have tiny bikinis on display at beaches—more daring in some places than others, but basically very acceptable and admirable today.   A photograph of a woman dressed in such attire would not be shocking today.

But what is the background of such photography and when did it become acceptable?  And what about nude photography of women (and men) ?   It is said that when photography was invented in England in the 19th century, the first images obtained were female nudes.   In 1951, when this U.S. Camera cover of a girl in a bikini was published, there was an ongoing debate going on regarding the nudes in Playboy. However, in the fine art world, nudes had been acceptable in museums, galleries and publications such as U.S. Camera for many years, so the choice of this 1951 cover was mild by this magazine’s standards. In fact , this July 1951 edition of U.S. Camera contained a nude by  Edward Weston.

From U.S. Camera, 1951.

 

U.S. Camera began publication in 1938, a time of great excitement in the field of photography.  Edward Steichen was an advisor to the magazine, and nudes by the greatest photographers were shown in their pages back to the 1930′s.  The publisher /editor of the magazine, Tom Maloney, was arguing for a more liberal attitude towards “figure photography.”   In 1952, one year after this issue of U.S. Camera was published, he produced an entire special edition of nudes by many of the great pioneers of art photography such as Edward Weston, Harry Callahan and others.  Tom Maloney could get away with that because he was an important figure in the world of fine art photography, but back then, you would never see a nude in your local newspaper,  in Life Magazine, or at “the movies.”   The venue was all important as to the acceptability of nude photographs.

The magazine ceased publication in 1969.  The era of glossy photo driven magazines  such as Life and Look was over. But, today, you can go to the Metropolitan Museum of Art and see an exhibit called, “Naked Before the Camera.”  You can also turn on TV or a movie to see that   “figure photography” is alive and well in our culture—just one advantage of living in a free society.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Blogfinger News, Photography | Tagged Photography: U.S. Camera | 3 Comments

3 Responses

  1. on July 18, 2012 at 8:55 am Frank S

    Locally here at the shore a lot of “cheesecake” photography was done. Milton Edelman (now in his 80′s) from Bradley Beach has many fotos of bathing beauties in bikinis he shot in the 50′s & 60′s. Not just on beach but posed on Berkeley Cartaret & Empress stairways too. I think the hotels and maybe even business’s in Asbury sponsored cheesy beauty contests. Also when I first moved to OG in mid 90′s our local modeling agency did cheesy shoots on the beach here with bikini clad teenagers.


  2. on July 23, 2012 at 7:25 pm gary saretzky

    Glad to see your mention Tom Maloney, who made a major contribution to photography but is not often remembered these days. For additional detail on Maloney, see my article in The Photo Review, “A Tom Maloney Chronology,” the text for which is available at http://gary.saretzky.com/photohistory/Maloney_essay.pdf


  3. on July 23, 2012 at 10:49 pm Paul @Blogfinger

    Mr.Saretzky: Thank you for sending us the link to your excellent article on Tom Maloney. I had found your contribution when looking around for information about U.S. Camera and that is where I learned some facts about Mr. Maloney.



Comments are closed.

  • Police Memorial Service. Great Auditorium, Ocean Grove, NJ. May 21, 2013. Paul Goldfinger photo ©

  • Recent Posts

    • Kisses on the Bottom May 22, 2013
    • Surprise: the green stuff all over everything is tree pollen, and the counts are very high. May 22, 2013
    • OG Homeowners Meeting: Featuring the Derelict Buildings Committee Report May 22, 2013
    • Governor Christie Supports Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association’s TOGETHER Campaign and FEMA Appeal for Sandy Recovery May 22, 2013
  • Recent Comments

    OGJamie on What’s With the Fishing…
    Lisa on Governor Christie Supports Oce…
    Lisa on Governor Christie Supports Oce…
    Doubting Thomas on What’s With the Fishing…
    Devo on OG Homeowners Meeting: Featuri…
  • Archives

  • But who's counting?

    • 1,241,498 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Customized MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 293 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: